Logo

Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?

Last Updated: 22.06.2025 03:43

Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?

Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?

What’s next?

Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.

Intel Stock (NASDAQ:INTC) Blasts Up as Mac Support Dies - TipRanks

Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.

Let’s just make it real clear:

Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.

How can I be the smartest human on Earth?

Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.

“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.

Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.

At 53, Jennie Garth Poses in Her First-Ever Underwear Campaign - instyle.com

Thank you.

Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.

Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.

What did someone say to you that instantly made you realize their life was in danger?

Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.

Russia can stop this any time.

Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.

Why do we let ugly men exist?

Just in the last 5 years:

Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.

Any day of the week — including Sundays.

We've Been Misreading a Major Law of Physics For Nearly 300 Years - ScienceAlert

Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.

Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?

Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?

Dollar Tree raises red flag about unexpected customer behavior - TheStreet

Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.

Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.

Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.

'I did a bit of a dance': Detectorist finds gold 'mourning ring' engraved with skull and date in UK field - Live Science

Sending ATACMS is WW3.

Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.

All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.

Former Charles Manson follower is recommended for parole - NBC News